原来电脑的钟慢一个小时
今天才发现，现在我的电脑上显示的是2:31，可是实际上应该是3:31。
应该是从到了日本就这样了吧？竟然一直没有被发现。可见对于不在意的事情，自己是多么不敏感。
终于明白，为什么总是巨困无比了：因为我是按照电脑的时间上床睡觉，按手机上的时间起床。。。。。。实际值总是比理论值少一。竟然也就这样过了半年。
无话可说。
10/30/2005
10/28/2005
10/26/2005
死也不去学校！
哼哼！来complain一下。
昨天晚上折腾到两点多才睡觉，早上七点昏昏沉沉醒来，手机收到邮件一封，实验室的越南dd发来的。告诉我说明天十一点跟老板meeting，还让我通知实验室的另一个日本dd。心里嘀咕了一下：明天要逃日语课了。翻身接着睡。
完全醒来的时候，已经九点半。仔细想了一下，是半夜三点发来的短信。那么那时候的“明天”，就是“今天”！丫神经病啊。大半夜的告诉我第二天早上开会！还要再负责通知另一个人（我跟那个日本dd又不是很熟）！
大家要知道，自从搬到乡下以后，迷笛到学校的单程距离是一个半小时。还要再加上刷牙洗脸涂脂抹粉的时间。如果早上九点半的课，那么七点二十起来才可以。现在告诉我说十一点? 开玩笑。
于是发信给越南dd，很客气的说没戏，然后跟他说以后一定要“提前”通知我。（是，你再半夜告诉我说第二天开会?）又跟老板写信说明情况承认错误；并申请重新约时间。
总算把这些搞定，决定开始死磕我的cvs。又收到越南dd的邮件。
说：没关系，你迟到可以，我可以先讲，大概会讲一个小时。
看了这封信，迷笛很生气。
很多人，如果他自己犯了错误，绝对不会承认和承担后果。就像这个越南dd。他负责通知大家开会，不知道什么原因拖到最后。最后有了状况，完全不去解决。只是想掩饰。
迷笛就算十二点赶到了学校，老板不要吃午饭么？如果是组会的话，那个日本弟弟如果没有看到邮件，参加么？如果会议cancel，那么我路上的三个小时，你赔偿么？之所以他不去跟老板沟通约定另外的时间，解决这些问题，就是因为如果说起来，是因为他自己失职。
早看穿你的心肝脾肺肾。最后还是老板人好，回了信，说改天。
姐姐可是女博士，跟姐姐斗。
现在心里很忐忑的，因为老板布置的课题，很久没有动了。希望不会被他砍伤。
source forge
在source forge上创建了一个项目，拿来给自己做试验用。
今天总算是搞好了ssh+cvs。
以前在实验室的时候，在windows上架过一个cvs服务器。大家一个组的成员，一起开发。自己感觉还是很不错的，尝到了点甜头。这次反正也要做试验（虽然只是自己一个人），就干脆把代码放在source forge上，假装前卫一把。
项目的首页在这里。
(哈哈，上当了吧。里面还什么都没有！^@^)
-----------------------------------------
协议
在选择协议的时候，一看下拉框里面那么多就疯了。
只好跑去找大黄求助。大黄推荐BSD和GPL。最后用的是BSD。
一来是因为大黄在推荐的时候，说：“如果你有洁癖，就可以选GPL。”为了证明自己很平庸；就选了不会有洁癖的那个。很可笑吧，其实迷笛私心里还是比较喜欢GPL的；我也觉得这绝对是一别扭的小孩嘛。^_^当然还有一个原因是，GPL相对熟悉一些。这次就挑个陌生的。
于是就开始给sourceforge写项目申请，编理由。开始还害怕被他们据，事实证明，巨快就批准。
-----------------------------------------
cvs
今天早上起来，就开始设置cvs。
以前是在windows 服务器上架的cvs server。算是玩具。用的是pserver，这次要用ext。没碰过。
捣鼓了这么久，中间又跑去骚扰jjgod，最后搞定。
没搞定的期间，深刻的反省，自己果然是老了，思维不清晰，本来简单的事情，却也要做很久。 后来想想，以前也是简单的事情做很久，哈哈，一样慢。
于是放心。
------------------------------------------
那么最后的结局就是这样：
comment一下是：
1.工具：
- wincvs
- putty(ssh连结和配置主程序) ，plink(命令行ssh链接程序)， pageant(agent),和puttygen（公钥私钥生成程序）
- 顺便又重装了一个低版本的python。因为wincvs只能支持2.1.3一下的phython。上次装了一个2.3的，形同虚设。(虽然现在也是形同虚设)。python跟wincvs的ssh连接没有什么关系。由上面两组软件就可以了。
2. windows环境变量
CVS_RSH我的plink.exe目录是: d:\program files\putty\plink.exe。这个program files不灵的:D 改成PROGRA~1就可以了
3关于putty中session的名称。
起一个正常一点的名字！我的session原来叫做：sf-dom-sensus，结果在wincvs中完全不灵。大概最后n长时间都是在搞这个。芬特勒。
4.经验。以后碰触不熟悉的东西的时候，还是先老老实实跟着help来。开始我想用intellij自己带的cvs客户端，又想用自己挖出来的keygen，又想用自己挖出来的ssh link。其实没有什么系统是完全可插拔的。被维护者努力推荐的方案，一定是最简单的！自己搞小聪明，当然是费力不讨好。一定要记住^_^ 。
10/24/2005
Questions related to SW and what's your answer?
Labels:
English
Recently, sig semis is reparing an interview of Tim Berners-Lee.
A bunch of questions are collected Miltiadis Lytras , which are interesting and worth thinking about.
How I expect the answers from TBL and the others!
If it happens you are working for the SW now, try to answer them. :-)
---------------------------
1. William Woods wrote "Over time, many people have responded to the need for increased rigor in knowledge representation by turning to FOL as a semantic criterion. This distresses me, since it is already clear that FOL is insufficient to deal with many semantic problems,....". Lotfi Zadeh has similarly talked about the limitations of crisp logic. And Tom Gruber and Amit Sheth have been talking about "informal, semi-formal, formal ontologies", and "implicit, formal and powerful semantics," (e.g., a paper in IJSWIS 1(1) titled "Semantics for the SW: the implicit, the formal and the powerful"). Challenges have been seen not only when modeling NLP problems but also when modeling Life Sciences. However it seems, you are very bullish on DL and want to build at least initial SW on a DL based infrastructure. Is that so? If yes, why? If not, how do you anticipate that KR issues might progress?
2. There is a long standing vision that has focused on named relationships (e.g, Venevar Bush: "The process of tying two items together is the important thing.", William Woods: "What's in a link", or Amit Sheth" "Relationships at the heart of semantics"). DL provides reasoning based on sumbsmptive reasoning, but some see that to be highly limited in value and impact as it could not help much with exploiting named relationships, such as those in mining/discovery application that involve computing paths and "connecting the dots". Could you please share your views on computing with a focus on relationships and contexts?
3. What he thinks of Web 2.0. (www.web2con.com) - (The browser Flock, the email Zimbra, Ajax, etc)?
4. Has the Semantic Web lost an enormous opportunity of being part of the so-called Web 2.0 technologies?
5. I would like to hear Sir Tim Berners-Lee comment on is the layered architecture/model of the Semantic Web 5 years after its introduction by him at the XML 2000 conference. Does the model/architecture change given the Current technologies, and how?
6. The WWW has been comparatively much more successful than Artificial Intelligence. I see AI researchers are becoming very active in the Semantic Web. Does that mean the Semantic Web will not be a success (compared to the standards of the WWW)? Or, to put a positive spin on it, can the Semantic Web finally make AI a success?
7. In Sir Berners-Lee's opinion, when will commercial tools help the development of semantic web-based implementation? I.e., when will tools like DreamWeaver or FileMaker Pro support semantic web capabilities?
8. Over what time period do you expect the Semantic Web to enter mainstream technology and become as widely used as the existing web?
9. To what extent will intelligent agents play a role in harnessing the Semantic Web and how would you define an agent within this context?
10. What is the web after the Semantic Web?
11. It seems to be generally agreed that getting knowledge into machines in the Form of ontologies is a good thing. On the other hand, one prominent person in this field recently presented a slide showing a disconnect between ontologies and ROI. (Return on Investment).Can you [Tim] please point out some areas where ontologies have provided ROI, or are expected to do so? Would validating that instance data from several sources conforms to a schema specified in OWL perhaps be one such area?
12. The W3C is starting a Working Group on rule languages for the Semantic Web. What kinds of "rule languages" seem necessary on the SW and why? Are you considering reactive rules or trigger-like rules, i.e. of the kind if event then action, or deduction rules, i.e. rules of the kind if data then new-data? Are policies, e.g. for web service negotiations, a "rule issue" or an issue on its own for the W3C? What is new on the SW as far as rule languages are concerned? Will the W3C rule WG develop new rule languages? new rule processors? Is monotonic vs. non-monotonic negation a SW issue? An issue for rule languages on the SW?
13. What are the key challenges for next generation Web search? How will multimedia search on the Web be addressed in the future?
14. Basically Albert-Loszlo Barabasi in Notre Dame Uni argued that WWW follows scale-free network model, which means that Zipf's law applies. My question is would Semantic Web follow the same law?
15. A question I would like to see answered is related to TRUST - a lot has been done in terms of developing the SW infrastructure, better tools, languages and techniques but trust seems to be a bottleneck. Could you ask him to elaborate on this topic - present (federations, Verisign and the like, is it enough? ) and Future (do we need new technology? will we ever get there?)
16. I think it's definitely worth touching on Tim's view of the role of the W3C. Is early central standardization relevant to web-centric technologies? One can certainly argue (and I do) that HTML and HTTP succeeded precisely because most of their evolution was conducted in a distributed ad-hoc manner. Beyond Tim's original seed, the W3C contributed primarily after the fact, and its formal definitions are still quite far removed from the realities of web distribution and applications. When the W3C has tried to blaze genuinely new ground, such as with XSchema and SOAP, developers and users tend to prefer simpler ad-hoc solutions. SOAP is being largely ignored in favour of plain HTTP and XML; will the semantic web be built with W3C standards, or with ad-hoc solutions emerging from user/developer communities?
17. "Massively Multiplayer Online Games are among the richest online environments wrt to interactivity and communication between users, how do you think the relationship between the future web and such games will be?"
18. What bothers me is that the assistance to newcomers in RDF/OWL is poorly organized, or rather not organized at all. Yes, we have our forum, but when I ask for solutions to problems the answers usually do not come from anyone of, say, the top-50 experts. There are a few occasional exceptions (Hendler, Manola, Hayes, Horrocks, Ayers, DeRoo) but that is about it (I may have forgotten one or two). Sometime, somewhere I have read a statement on the W3C site about the need to help implementers with their implementation (can't find it back), but in this case it may be a bit better organized. If SW really is required to take off, we better assist the one million-or-so new implementers. Not to be mistaken: I don't want to be a spoiled kid, because what has been accomplished so far is impressive, and free to use. I am grateful for that. My suggestion is to get this organized so that when someone really needs help, he/she gets it from an authoritive person (I'd rather have no response that a faulty one!). Perhaps they can render their services according a roster or so. I have "lived" for years on the forum for XML Schema, and found that one person (Henry Thompson) seemed to feel responsible for the provision of solutions in case nobody reacted.. 19. Why W3C is promoting technology which is 30 years behind the leading edge from a simplicity point of view and "square wheel" unreasonable.
20. How come we're not getting there faster?"
21. What's his opinion on the Two Tower / One Tower-Rules quarrel going on? 2. Does he feel like the SemWeb is going in the direction he envisaged?
22. How did his vision change over time?
23. "We know that you believe that the semantic web vision will extend to machine-to-machine services, to enable automatic discovery, composition, invocation, and monitoring of families of web services to support end-user requests. What do you see as the sequence of major innovations and standardization activities that will bring this vision into reality, and how long do you think it will take?"
24. Do you think that dimensions such as (version of resources, country or region of resources, level of trust of resources) which are used in (Learning metadata) will be key elements in the semantic web? Do you think that researches in learning communities are complementary to the SW road map, and resources will finally be like Learning objects? Do you think that the semantic web is moving to a big Geographic Information System in which boundaries will appears again?
25. I would like to ask Sir. Timothy Berners Lee about his opinion on extending modelling of Semantic Web by ordering by relevance, preference, more or less semantically linked resources. This feature is present in Information Retrieval, search engines and also in multicriterial decision (just to mention a few). In his first vision of Semantic Web in the Scientific American paper it is present, but I am missing this in modelling standards recommended and/or developed by W3C.
26. I'd be curious to know what he is doing at the moment (management? research? public relationship?) or/and what sort of issue he is in the process of tackling. What he regards as the current and short terms challenges in his capacity as a W3C chairman. So, that is a question centered on his activity. Now, more specifically and less about him, maybe, I would be curious to know whether he has any insight on current and short term researchable issues in the context of the semantic web.
27. Some Questions that are rarely asked of the W3C technical community:28. Why is the Internet still so English language dependent and centric? One of the greatest advantages of W3C/semantic web technology is to provide the detailed context to make multiple language platforms translations more accurate. For example; the technology exists today to apply English queries to Chinese data domains; and the reverse.
29. Where is the future technical and market leadership to drive this multi language environment? Given the rapid growth of non-native English users and sources; particularly in Chinese, will the Internet split into language centric factions. For example; Chinese and English users now interact largely within only their own separate language data domains.
30. Do defacto standards like Google; with the inherent limitations in content and context understanding, drive the Internet into separate language factions?
31. Given the lack of Google and W3C focus on development of a multi-language architecture; does this mean that we are all doomed to live within our own single language domains.
32. What do you think of the capabilities, and the future, of the MKR language?
*******************************************
AND my SIGSEMIS point of view:
*******************************************
1. Miltiadis: Dear Sir, I am delighted that you agreed to this interview. In a recent interview with Thomas Davenport he told me something quite interesting. "The only way we can make our field more useful is to start doing-and rewarding work that can be read and applied by businesspeople". How happy you are with the Business Impact of the SW till now?
2. Miltiadis: You are leading W3C. What you regard as the current and short terms challenges in your capacity as a W3C Director.
3. Miltiadis: In AIS SIG on Semantic Web and Information Systems we do believe in multidisciplinary contributions. How do you see the synergies of the SW with various scientific fields? Do you feel that a lot has to be done in the references of SW to established disciplines?
4. Miltiadis: In the last couple years we try to boost awareness for SW in various communities. A common finding is while people are really thirsty to know more about SW they finally give it up since they consider SW as a solid technological issue. Do you think we are missing something in the SW cake?
5. Miltiadis: Lately many people reveal the need to promote more human centric characteristics to the SW. For example Ambjorn Naeve from the Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden emphasizes on the need to apply a Context Modelling layer to SW pyramid, since people's needs relate to real world contexts- he provided the term Human Semantic Web to this. Have you update your SW definition since its first introduction to the Scientific America Article?
6. Miltiadis: The evolution of your web is really amazing. Currently some people discuss for Web 2.0 or put more critical milestones like the one of Ambient Web. If we look behind the interesting name-making for triggering people what are the key ingredients of SW in real world terms?
7. Miltiadis: In our interview with Eric Miller, your W3C Semantic Web Activity Leader, a lot of emphasis was based on the priority for Collaborative life. What is your vision for the collaboration in the context of the SW?
8. Miltiadis: Several times I am contacting people from research institutes worldwide. A general conclusion is that they all share a very optimistic vision for the role of new technologies but they face many problems. What are the major problems that you see in the promotion of the Digital World?
9. Miltiadis: Our colleagues in SIGSEMIS from all over the world provide the next five questions. In your opinion when will commercial tools help the development of semantic web-based implementation? I.e., when will tools like DreamWeaver or FileMaker Pro support semantic web capabilities?
10. Miltiadis: A lot of research is relating to Semantic Social Networking or Semantic Social Intelligence. Do you anticipate Social Intelligence as a key part of your vision for the SW?
11. Miltiadis: If we judge from a content perspective the current web then many "deficits" will be evident. What about multimedia content management or content from virtual collaboration suites in SW era??
12. Miltiadis: What would you say to companies who after years of handwork have finally gotten their systems integrated, and are reluctant to invest any further in integration technology even if it is better?
13. Miltiadis: I am aware that you will have in Babson College, where Tom Davenport is leading the Research, a talk on SW. How do you see the collaboration of CS and IS people towards the creation and promotion of fresh ideas on the role of the SW to our society?
14. Miltiadis: Recently I interviewed Prof. Amit Sheth, from LSDIS of the University of Georgia, and CTO of Semagix. He is enthusiastic for the role of Semantics. With the emergence of mobile and Wireless networks how important you think is the research on semantics of less traditional contexts. E.g. the Semantics of M-business?
15. Miltiadis: We have many inquiries to ask you for the potential application of SW to specific industries. E.g. defence, social security, government etc. Which sectors do you anticipate as more mature to harvest the SW benefits?
16. Miltiadis: If we look at the world map, then I feel that we (as computer science/information systems people) must be sad for the gap between developed world and the countries that fall behind. At the other extreme of course technologies provide a new opportunity for self-sustained development. What is your vision for a social sensitive SW - or how leading edge approaches like SW could promote critical social objectives?
17. Miltiadis: Semantic Web and university curricula. How do you see the integration of Semantic Web within Computer Science and Information Systems academic programs ?And further more how do you judge the training opportunities for people in SW technologies? Is there a gap there?
18. Miltiadis: Many people worldwide perceive that Google will be the first industry player that will commercialise SW technologies? Is this due to the culture of Google to invest in the knowledge of people or a matter that SW requires economies of Scale?
19. Miltiadis: In SIGSEMIS we are working on the development of SWISE (SW enabled Information Systems) Research and Competence Centre - a multidisciplinary distributed centre with open access and participants from various disciplines. How do you see informal groups and communities of practice worldwide to contribute to your vision for the SW?
20. Miltiadis: Any thoughts you would care to share on the formation of the Special Interest Group on Semantic Web and Information Systems on AIS?
---------------------------------------
10/23/2005
小事故们
太久不运动。手脚就不协调了。
早上跑去打网球。结果，拍子打了眼睛。现在左眼的眼角一片淤青。就当是烟熏装好了。
打完网球回来收拾抽风机。蹲在地上铺隔离粉尘的纸，结果一站起来天旋地转。不是一般的那种天旋地转。感觉是连续传了无数圈。等到恢复过来的时候，脑子里一片空白。记忆是一点一点恢复的：我是谁，我在哪里，我在这里干什么？这个最后一个问题，想了好久，最后才想起来是要把抽风机的排风扇装上。
这个就是，平时不好好吃饭。早上起来不去吃饭就去运动的结果。
下午去homepic买油盐酱醋杂货们。出了自行车停车场，推车的时候竟然摔倒。半条裤子完全变黑........在那里拍阿拍阿拍阿拍阿......
晚上跑去大家一起吃火锅和聊天。:D看到一个82年的小弟弟，在为未来发愁。哈哈。然后就感觉到自己真的老了。那么久以前，自己也是忧心忡忡地想着未来，觉得自己有无限的可能，热烈而焦躁的盼望着未来呢。
而现在，我的梦想就是，坐吃等死。
这是多么幸福的四个字。不知道什么时候才能实现。
10/21/2005
10/18/2005
Chapter 7 Ontology engineering
Labels:
English
- Ontology is a model of a particular domain, built for a particular purpose. As a consequence, there is no correct ontology of a specific domain. An ontology is by necessity an abstraction of a particular domain, and there are always viable alternatives.What is included in this abstraction should be determinded by the use to which the ontology will be put, and by future extensions that are already anticipated.
- >An important advantage of the use of OWL over RDF Schema is the possibility to detect inconsistencies in the ontology itself, or in the set of instances that were defined to populate the ontology.
- The success of the Semantic Web greatly Depends on the proliferation of ontologies and relational metadata. This requires taht such metadata can be produced at high speed and low cost. To this end, the task of merging and aligning ontologies for establishing semantic interoperability may be supported by machine learning techniques.
- One has to provide a means for maintaining and adopting the machine-processable data hat is the basic for the Semantic Web. Thus, we need mechanisms that support the dynamic nature of the Web. ...These problems resemble those that knowledge engineers have dealt with over the last two decades as they worked on knoweldge acuisition methodologies or workbenches for defining knowledge bases.
-------------------------------------
Comments by midi:
(I focused on domain ontology)
1. What the ontology of a particular domain looks like will be partly decided by the anticipated usage of the ontology.
Yes, it is just what we do currently.
If new application emerges which demands new concepts and relations (or different meaning on the original concepts & relations), new ontology will be created based on the old one.
Maybe the problem is :
a) when one starts to build its own ontology, he may find many related ontologies already exist, based on which he can build his own one. But how to compare and reuse them correctly and efficiently?
again, the ontology mapping and integration techniques are helpful. (just naively speaking.)
2. point 3 is just what I want to do now. It convinces me that the direction is right.
3. related background: knowlege management.
A Semantic Web Primer
Labels:
English
Grigoris Antoniou and Frank Van Harmelen
The MIT Press
Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England
ISBN:0-262-01210-3
-----------------------------
Content
-----------------------------
Chapter 1
...
Chapter7 Ontology Engineering
做快乐生活的猪
猪快乐的真谛，就是enjoy now。
----------------
qq是个好东西。
----------------
昨天跟老爸视频qq了一把。（废了多大的劲才成功的啊。而且还不能语音，肯定是老爸那里的设置有问题）然后看到老爸好久好久打出来一行字：
我们看到你，都觉得很高兴。
我们=老爸老妈。迷笛一下子就感动的一塌糊涂了：在这个世界上，有这样的人们，仅仅因为看到你，就觉得开心。
------------------------
以狗屎开始的一天
------------------------
早上九点半日语课。
七点二十
起床。打开电视，天气预报说台风要来了。我说为什么天天下雨下个不停。
八点。
收拾完毕。虽然下雨，还是要穿的光鲜，并且，涂脂抹粉；日本对女性，或者说，日本的女性，大概就是这么要求的。打扮漂亮，一手撑伞一手扶车把。骑车去车站。
八点二十
到了免费停车场1。发现原来它九点才开，只好返身折回去免费停车场2。踩着高跟鞋把车子停在一团烂泥里。不禁悲从衷来：一样大的同学们，应该已经开始买车了。迷笛还在这里跟烂泥中的自行车死磕....
走路十分钟再次到车站。坐JR(东京城铁)。
八点57分
jr停到到中野，下车，导地下铁。
倒错车。跑去到了反方向的列车。九点回到刚刚经过的一个站台。
九点十分
终于坐上正确的地下铁。隔壁座位的老头，似乎一直在放屁...
九点三十分，下车再导车。九点四十分，到达目的地车站。
穿高跟鞋小跑。
九点五十分
到教室。
一身汗。
------------------------
美女都不见了
------------------------
我和东子，前后搬去了乡下。我在三鹰，东子在横浜旁边的什么。
我们就哀号：终于脱离了山手线，去到了乡下线！以后，再也不能坐在山手线上看美女了！
今天早上频繁换车的空当，我就想，以后要约东子每周末去做山手线，还一直坐不下车，还作七圈。把一周没有看的美女，都补回来！
补充说明一下，山手线大概就类似于北京的二环，三环。经过所有东京比较有名的地点。比如新宿，涉谷，品川，银座，池袋，是以，美女地大大的有。
10/17/2005
Information Retrieval Support for Ontology Construction and Use
Willem Robert van Hage, Maarten de Rijke, Maarten Marx: Information Retrieval Support for Ontology Construction and Use. International Semantic Web Conference 2004: 518-533
-------------------------
content
-------------------------
1.利用ir/ie技术搭建ontology.
a)propose concept
b)创建instance（实际不是instance，而是产生automatic hyperlink，也就是，将concept对应到latex文档中的/article/section/paragraph段落）。
2.ontology searching的一个简单实现。
---------------------------
rank: ****
relativity: *****
further reading:
1.G. Antoniou and F. van Harmelen. A Semantic Web Primer. MIT Press, 2004.
10/13/2005
10/10/2005
我是蠢笨的小资
这句话要这样断，“我是蠢笨的-小资”。不能断成“我是-蠢笨的小资”。否则我就是在攻击小资整个群体了，那压力太大。
迷笛一直是以粪青的形象混世的。但是在内心里；在不易为人察觉，甚至不易为自己察觉的内心里，迷笛属于小资。具体表现为：迷笛可以不突出，但不能脏乱差和手忙脚乱，这就是小资典型的假仙心态。
大四毕业那一个夏天，住在西门外面的学校旅馆。
适逢那条小小的必经之路在开挖，谁知道是在装下水还是重新铺路。每次一下雨，整条路就变成一片烂泥。回去旅馆的时候，泥点跳起来溅在腿上，粘糊糊的粘在脚底和指缝之间，让人想要晕倒；何况又会想起白天太阳晒着的时候，臭烘烘的气味不断上升；胃就开始紧缩，干呕。
那年夏天频繁的暴雨，让迷笛连自杀的心都有。变成神经质，天天看天气预报会不会下雨；如果下雨，就宁愿在实验室呆一宿也不要回去睡觉。因为这条路，本来应该意气风发草长鹰飞的大四毕业，变成了迷笛最不堪回首的日子。
这就是蠢笨的小资。其实问题的解决方法有很多。最土的就是穿裤子和胶鞋，或者搬另一个旅馆等等。但是迷笛不会，迷笛只是在努力的专心的发愁，痛苦。这就是小资。
迷笛搬家了。开始添置家电。要了一个电视机，从别人家自己搬回家里。电视机重一点，ok。但是在电车里，自己旁边堆着一个箱子...让迷笛羞愧难当。其实电视机的主人把箱子包得很漂亮，但是。敏感，而且虚荣的小资。
小资迷笛搬到了三鹰。终于要开始自己抹地板，打扫下水道，清洗马桶。不瞒你说，只是想到“打扫下水道”“清洗马桶”这样的字眼，就让迷笛难过得想吐，对未来失去勇气了。
昨天在宿舍，跟新认识的中国朋友一起聊天，说起这个来。她立刻叫到：对，我们都是一样的人！看起来很独立什么都ok，其实一点点小事就会崩溃。嗯。没错，崩溃。
我见过很多人，很会生活。他们不会被这些小事情难倒，应付起来轻松自如，备选方案种类繁多。就像迷笛应付程序中的bug一样。所以你不得不承认，人确实是有不同的天赋的；而且，老天是平等的。你不能同时拥有多种天赋，有了这个，那个就会少一点。
现在，迷笛正开始努力的，自觉地从小资象主妇转变，慢慢的。
10/06/2005
搬家去乡下住
嗯。终于住到了乡下。
乡下，空气新鲜，车少人少，民风淳朴，还有就是，房租便宜。
---------------------------
宅急便的帅哥
---------------------------
前两天，把自己的所有衣物被子，打了两个135的大旅行包。找了黑猫宅急便拿走。拿我行李的，还是宅急便的同一个帅哥。由于以前迷笛充分的利用internet资源订这个订那个，同时极大地发扬女性反复无常的多变性格。该帅哥已经与迷笛打了非常次照面。
只是，从此，不再相见，不再相见，无法再相见。（^_*）
宅急便真得很不错。我的两个箱子，三边和=150，重=25kg左右，每个要1680日元，两个就是3360。他们上门取，然后又送到我三鹰的宿舍。3360是什么概念呢？迷笛来回一趟，车费就是1120。 ^_^
---------------------------
网络！十万火急！！
---------------------------
今天自己拖着可爱的115旅行箱。从大井町的家里，爬山涉水，乘京浜东北线，乘山手线，乘中央线，乘公交车；过品川，过新宿，到三鹰。一路上，谜笛就不停的幻想：自己这样子，也很有点在东京茫茫人海中辗转和生活的样子了。
一开宿舍门，扑鼻而来一股涂料的味道......顾不上喘气，迷笛从可爱115中拿出了自己的电脑。然后电话电脑部门要求连接internet。服务员是日本人......ok，拼了！基本上迷笛都是在讲半句话，剩下的让那边来猜，整个一quiz！
基本的信息比较好沟通。但是迷笛想立刻联网，right now!现在！马上！但是服务小姐说，应该先去涉谷的一个银行支店办理什么手续。我就跟她说，我能不能现在使用网络，然后明天再去办手续。简单吧？但是迷笛完全不会讲，怎么都不会讲。那个“使用”两个字，好难啊。最后反复地说，不说完不挂电话，最后终于让小姐猜出来“使用”两个字！哈哈，quiz过关。任务成功完成。
然后就发现原来还没有网线。于是冲去学生科要了周边的地图。问那里的老师哪里有什么商店什么商店，就当作今天第一天踩点好了。在学生科碰到一个中国人，上大二的法律专业。这是一个以出日本政客的而闻名的专业哦。并没有攀谈，那个孩子只是告诉了迷笛又有一个图上没有标出来的百元店。
买了网线，和一些生活用品。在周围的商店溜达了溜达。回家，联网。成功！
---------------------------
朋友^_^
---------------------------
下午四点半的时候，迷笛的两个大箱子成功送到门口。要知道，三楼，没有楼梯.......我很同情这个帮我送东西的职员。嗯，看起来一般帅，但是很诚恳。不错，以后迷笛还会麻烦你很多次的。嘿嘿。
收拾得期间，收到了芳的短信。问什么时候搬家，告诉她我已经在三鹰拉~ 要搬家的时候，很多朋友都有关心自己，说如果要帮忙的话，不要客气叫上他们。虽然迷笛心里是坚持不到万不得已的时候不要给人家添麻烦，但是这样让迷笛觉得心里很温暖。所以所有提出过帮助我的朋友，迷笛一并谢过了，也一并记在心里。:)
10/03/2005
开学了
这个是昨天的可爱老虎。^_^好想要一个 。
偶然去了学校一趟，才知道就是今天开学。就跟着tutor去试听老板的课。发现完全听不懂。老板，不是我不拍你啊....然后就开始选课。搞定了已经是下午五点。
本来还跟starsea约了，只好作罢。辗转拜托大黄在网上联系了她。说抱歉。不甘心！然后就去理发。
以前大话上男女两性阵营吵架的时候，男生都说，女生真的不会看地图么？假仙。其实我很想告诉他们，我真的会看地图；我只是找不到自己处于地图上的哪一点。我就这样手上拿着从yahoo日本打印出来的地图，绕着目标找了25分钟，最终找到目标所在building。它的实际距离与车站两分钟.....兴冲冲跑去2f的一家理发店。被告知它不是我要找的，我要找的在同一building的另一个入口的二楼。也就是它们物理位置的隔壁。嘿嘿。
为什么迷笛要死乞白赖的找他们家呢？因为从hotpepper（类似于国内的bfshopping）上看到它们在特价。嘿嘿。虽然咱们日语不好，也还是要在日本幸福生活不是。递给理发小姐我从杂志上剪下来得人物头像，让她就按照那个剪。然后我就开始犯困。
剪完了，看了一下。并不惊艳，但是足够让我安全的混迹在日本人中间。ok，然后让她把刘海帮我又修短了一点点。付账走人。
第一次在东京自己去理发店。:) 以前都是在东子的带领下去的。所以有点小小的开心。
回来继续收拾屋子准备搬家。但是据说要下雨到周五....
10/02/2005
TVB和搬家
最近在看TVB的《酒店风云》。准确地说是已经看完了，30集。
似乎沉浸在电视剧里面，就忘记了自己处在东京这个事实。
一转眼又到了搬家的时候。环顾四周，全部家当也不过就是两只大号登机箱而已。这就是27年所能拥有的所有东西吧。
今天在超市看到一个人扮的老虎，很可爱。立刻冲上去要求合照。冬子给照的，很不错。小样最近照相技术有长进。表扬。本来想贴照片的。结果blogger掉链子。算了。
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
